Part of the supreme court’s ruling in scott v. sandford stated a. enslaved people did not have the right to bring a case to court. b. free african americans had the same rights as other us citizens. c. enslaved people could not go into free states or territories. d. the missouri compromise should be upheld.

- C.) Enslaved people could not go into free states or territories.

<3

A. enslaved people did not have the right to bring a case to court.

Explanation:

In the case Scott v. Sanford, one of the statements that the ruling included was that Black people, whether enslaved or free, were not considered American citizens, and therefore, could not bring a case to court. The decision also states that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional. It, however, did not mention that enslaved people could not go into free states or territories, although this would not be equivalent to granting them freedom.

the first two-party system consisted of the federalist party, who supported the ratification of the constitution, and the democratic-republican party or the anti-administration party (anti-federalists), who opposed the powerful central government, among others, that the constitution established when it took effect in

now you can mark brain hope this