To what extent is the scheduling of lucinda's trial legal? 1points a it is not legal because lucinda did not have enough time to prepare her defense. b it is not legal because the time from indictment to trial violated the speedy trial act of 1974. c it is legal because there are no constitutional requirements for speedy trials. d it is legal because courts are overwhelmed by the number of cases they must hear. multiple choice question 14 why is lucinda's decision to defend herself not advisable? 1points a defendants are always required to have legal counsel at trial. b lucinda should agree on a plea bargain before going to trial. c it is difficult to mount an effective legal defense for one's self. d only those who cannot afford an attorney may represent themselves. multiple choice question 15 lucinda has one previous conviction of retail theft, which raises the grade of her crime to that of a misdemeanor. the judge at lucinda's first appearance is running on a law and order platform in the upcoming election, and despite lucinda's ties to the community, he decides to set her bail at $1,000,000. to what extent is the judge's decision regarding bail appropriate? 1points a his decision is appropriate because bail is not even guaranteed in criminal cases. b his decision is not appropriate because the eighth amendment prohibits excessive bail. c his decision is not appropriate because judges must ror defendants charged with nonviolent offenses. d his decision is appropriate because he needs to ensure lucinda's appearance in court if released prior to trial. short answer question 16 to what extent was procedural due process followed in lucinda's case? why is it important that defendants have the right to procedural due process? 2points explain your answer in two to three complete sentences. 300 word(s) left