Flint v. nevada: a business owner believes state taxation laws are unconstitutional. explain which level of courts has original jurisdiction in this case—state court or federal court. explain your answer in 2 to 3 complete sentences.

The state court.

Explanation:

A business owner who believes that state taxation laws are unconstitutional should have his case handled at the state court.

This is because the state is in charge of collection and jurisdiction of sales charges.

Since in this case we are dealing with a business man then the state court has the jurisdiction to handle the case.

its d. you give me brainliest

there are indirect ways of affecting state laws   by with holding funding's. and that's why we have a 55mph speed on the high way with a design of 70mph speed.