Usatestprep
1. are actions and attitudes that are expected of people living in a democratic society.

a)civic responsibilities

b)civil disobedience

c)civil liberties

d)civil rights

2. disobeying laws can be a "civic responsibility" when those laws are

a)difficult

b)disliked

c)inconvenient

d)unjust

3. it is most important to stay informed about politics and current events so that you can make informed decisions

a) at election time

b)when watching t. v.

c)in class discussions

d)when thinking about things

A)Civic responsibilities, disliked, A) at election time

Explanation: A. civic responsibilites  

1. are actions and attitudes that are expected of people living in a democratic society.  

2. Disobeying laws can be a "civic responsibility" when those laws are  D)unjust  '

3. It is MOST important to stay informed about politics and current events so that you can make informed decisions A) at election time

1. A) Civic responsibilities are actions and attitudes that are expected of people living in a democratic society.

This is true. Some examples of civic responsibilities are participating in government, voting, volunteering, advocating for social causes, adopting and promoting values that benefit society, and acting in an ethical manner.

2. Disobeying laws can be a "civic responsibility" when those laws are D) unjust.

When a law is harmful to a group of society or society as a whole, does not favor social equality, takes away people's basic rights, causes chaos or does not contribute to the general welfare of a society, people have the civic responsibility of disobeying such law due to its anti-democratic and unjust nature.

3. It is MOST important to stay informed about politics and current events so that you can make informed decisions A) at election time

At election time, the citizens of a nation have the opportunity to choose WHO will make the policies that will shape a nation's economy, politics, and society. From all options, then, A is the most important.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.