Just as the fourth amendment’s right to privacy has been declared enforceable against the states through the due process clause of the fourteenth it is enforceable by the same sanction… as is used against the federal government. were it otherwise…the assurance against unreasonable searches and seizures would be ‘a form of words,’ valueless…’in the concept of ordered liberty.” - justice tom clark, mapp v. ohio (1961) which two principles are addressed in the excerpt above? i. the incorporation doctrine ii. the concept of eminent domain iii. the exclusionary rule iv. the “wall of separation” doctrin

The  two principles are addressed in the excerpt above are:

I. The incorporation doctrine  AND III. The exclusionary rule

Explanation:

Justice Tom Clark, in the Mapp v. Ohio Case (1961), addressed the following two principles the incorporation doctrine and the exclusionary rule.

The incorporation doctrine makes the Bill of Rights (the first ten amendments) apply to the states as well as the nation through the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause.

The Exclusionary rule, under the Fourth Amendment, allows for the exclusion of evidence gotten by illegal means through law enforcement (not having a warrant or not having probable cause to search for evidence).

i'll just take the points xd

the earthquake in haiti was a magnitude of 7.0 according to the u.s geological survey yet the smaller earthquake in haiti killed more than 200,000 and left more than 1.2 million people homeless. the chile earthquake was a magnitude of 8.8 and 500 times more stronger but chile's earthquake only injured 712 people.