How did the supreme court rule in the miranda decision?
ernesto miranda was found guilty on all counts.
ernesto miranda had been denied his rights.
ernesto miranda could not be tried twice for the same crime.
ernesto miranda did not have the right to avoid self-incrimination.

the answer is B.Ernesto Miranda had been denied his rights.

Ernesto Miranda had been denied his rights.

Explanation:

Miranda v. Arizona was an important supreme court case. In the case the supreme court ruled that the court cannot accept the defendant's authorities unless the defendant is informed of their right to have attorney during questioning and told that anything they say will be held against him.  

Miranda was arrested for kidnapping a women. The law enforcement official interrogated him, he admitted to the crimes and signed a written confession. when his case went to trial his confession was used against him.

the chart shows a production possibilities schedule for sabrina’s soccer.

the schedule shows the - combination-   of goods the business can produce.

for edgenuit.

a small town is a good definition for new france in 1750. new france was the area colonized by france in north america. the area is nowadays the city of quebec in canada.