Which of the following is an example of stimulus discrimination in classical conditioning? hank thinks all elderly drivers are slow and leave their blinkers on. phoung is an aggressive driver, but stops for red lights because she got a ticket for running one several months ago. sung-lee believes that everyone should wear seat belts because she was hurt in an accident when she wasn't wearing one. after an accident with a red car last month, giorgio gets nervous when he sees a red car, but not when he sees a red truck or van.

The answer is: After an accident with a red car last month, Giorgio gets nervous when he sees a red car, but not when he sees a red truck or van.

In classical conditioning, stimulus discrimination refers to the stimulus that create different response from you compared to other similar stimulus.

The discrimination could occurs if you experience positive things from the stimulus in the past (which make you addicted) or negative things from that stimulus (which made you traumatized). In Giorgio's case, the stimulus discrimination occurs because he experienced a traumatic experience with a red car, which influence his nervousness every time he see one.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )