Compare and contrast wilson's foreign policy in asia with his actions in mexico and latin america. how would you explain the differences you note?

Wilson's foreign policy to Asia was antiimperialism which was conformed to a concern of confronting socialist expansion to achieve the American objectives of: Stability, trade, and access to territory, technology, trade and international good will. While in Latin America when Woodrow Wilson came into office, the United States hoped he would cultivate the friendship and deserve the confidence of Latin American States. Albeit strongly believed in a just Government that must rest upon the consent of the governed. Mexico on the other hand had an issue with the Wilsonian diplomacy. In 1913 counterrevolutionary General Victoriano Huerta clamped a bloody authoritarian rule in the country where Wilson was not impressed by this issue thus ended up calling it the "Government of butchers " which was against the Mexican people. This attracted anti-Huerta forces in Nothern Mexico led by Venustiano Carranza.

trade regulation is a field of law, often bracketed with antitrust (as in the phrase “antitrust and trade regulation law”), including government regulation of unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive business acts or practices. antitrust law is often considered a subset of trade regulation law. franchise and distribution law, consumer protection law, and advertising law are sometimes considered parts of trade regulation law.

in general the theory of economics says that the more open to trade a country is the better   the result for the same country and the whole economies.

in real life countries impose taxes, quotas, etc which is not so good for the economies.

this kind of commercial war between the usa and china is slowing down the growth of the whole world so we can say that it is a draw back of trade regulations. and the free trade agreements are benefits of trade regulations.

answer; when one group has an extremely high score at pretest;