You are a prosecutor trying your first case. you are thrilled with how well it is going. every objection you make is upheld, and every objection the defense makes is overruled. the judge shakes her head affirmatively every time you make a point and scowls and makes disparaging comments about and to the defense attorney. as the trial proceeds, you begin to see that it is going so well not because of your legal expertise, but rather, because the judge is obviously and seriously biased against the defense. you do not know if she simply does not like the defense attorney or if she does this in all the trials, but you do know that she is making it extremely difficult for the jury to ignore her and, thus, is violating the due process rights of the accused. should you be grateful for your good luck and accept an easy conviction or make a stand against the judge's actions?

What was the result of president taft's "dollar diplomacy

Sara and her friends were at an iowa football game in iowa city. sara is a life long resident of iowa and goes to college at dmacc. while she was in iowa city, robert smashed into her car when he ran a red light. sara was seriously injured and taken to university hospitals in iowa city (fortunately her injuries were not life threatening but laid her up for a long time and she had to drop out of college for the rest of the semester). robert is from michigan and was in iowa city to see the game and then to party later. at the time of the accident robert was drunk (at least legally - he blew a 0.17 and the limit is 0.08). sara has sustained about $500,000 in damages between her current and future medical bills, pain/suffering, lost wages, etc. also her car was totaled in the accident. can sara sue robert in a federal court? explain why or why not. (be sure to mention the two primary factors associated with suing someone in a federal court in a case like this.)

What is political freedom? how is it different from economic freedom?