What is one counter-argument to the premise that the wealth gap is a serious problem which needs to be addressed? the lower classes have the opportunity to invest. poor people can easily move into the middle class. investments by the upper class create lower-class jobs. buying power sharply increases for the working class.

One counter argument would be that the Investment by the wealthy or upper class create lower class jobs.

Explanation:

If the upper class people are successful, they can invest money and expand their business. As a consequence, this wealthy class will need workers and the lower class people will benefit from these job positions. It is the counter argument to the premise.

One counter-argument to the premise that the wealth gap is a serious problem which needs to be addressed:

d. i assume the underlined word is "role." reformat if it isn't.

explanation:

role is closest to part because when replacing words, "playing a vital decision," "playing a vital activity," and "playing a vital dollar" don't make logical sense. the only meaningful choice is "playing a vital part."

this fits one of merriam-webster's definitions of role: "a function or part performed especially in a particular operation or process."