Acriticism of interest group pluralism is its inherent propensity for compromise, the character of which tends to be antidemocratic. its class bias in favor of those with greater financial resources. that its ideals are too closely associated with marxist-leninist ideology and are therefore unacceptable to the majority of americans. that it favors the interests of large states over those of small states. that it gives too much influence to religious organizations and therefore threatens the separation of church and state.

A criticism of interest group pluralism is "its class bias in favor of those with greater financial resources".

One of the criticisms of interest group pluralism centers around imbalances that may hold on, in this way discoloring popularity based goals.  

Ideally, interest group pluralism alludes to the conflicting interest groups that work with the administration to make a social and law based parity for all. Be that as it may, interest group pluralism, as rehearsed, moves toward becoming discolored with cash and power. On the off chance that one gathering is favored among another gathering, the parity shifts. This can happen regularly with cash. On the off chance that the administration favors one gathering over another as a result of powers of cash or power, vote based system can come into inquiry. In this manner, there turns into a disparity in the portrayal of society overall. The incredible interest group can pressure the administration, and the legislature may start to settle on choices that don't support an equalization of sentiments and thoughts.

i think the answer is true : ))