Wht did the mexican revolution of 1810 and 1909 fail?

Both revolutions represented a brutal blow to investment and economic activity and delayed for decades the economic development of the country.

The census shows that the Mexican population fell from 15 million in 1900 to 14 million in 1920. This mortality was not the product of revolutionary battles, which were not so many nor so deadly, but a great mortality as a result of hunger and epidemics. These, however, found fertile land in the country precisely because of the Revolution.

To this day half of the Mexican population lives in poverty while 20 percent suffers the most absolute misery, without even having the ability to adequately feed their children. In that sense, the Revolution was a failure.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.