Social Studies, 04.07.2019 18:00 barnhill6515

Which of the following revealed germany’s attempt to ally with mexico against the united states a.)the zimmerman telegram b.)the sinking of the lusitania c.)the committee of public information d.) he episionage act

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:30

A. in weeks v. united states (1914), the court established the exclusionary rule, which was incorporated to the states in mapp v. ohio (1961), and the court established the concept of a "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule in united states v. leon (1984). in their opinion, the supreme court pointed out that compliance with the exclusionary rule can have a cost to society (criminals can go free) that outweighs the benefits (stopping illegal searches by police). ultimately, the court determined that despite the exclusionary rule, evidence can still be admitted in situations where police made genuine "good faith" efforts to act legally, but technically acted illegally, in obtaining the evidence. explain the exclusionary rule good faith exception and explain and support whether you agree or disagree with the concept of a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule? why or why not? use the lesson notes and/or one news source to support your answer.

Answers: 3

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 09:30

Which was not a part of the compromise of 1850? a. california was admitted to the u.s. as a free state. b. slavery was banned in western territories. c. slave trade was banned in washington d.c. d. the strict fugitive slave law was passed.

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 11:10

In the introduction of becoming mexican american, sanchez draws from stuart hall's notion of cultural identity (pg. 12-13). hall asserts that identities are enmeshed in "becoming and of being." they are subjected to the elements and context of history. explain what you think he means by the idea of becoming and being and explain how context fits into comprehending the american concept of manifest destiny.

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 11:50

Suppose that a father is walking his young daughter to school when a driver of an automobile negligently runs off the road and onto the sidewalk, hitting the girl but not her father. the young girl dies from her injuries. the father suffers severe emotional distress by seeing his daughter die and manifests his distress by suffering physically. which of the following is an accurate statement regarding the father's right to sue and recover damages from the driver of the automobile? a. the father can sue and recover damages from the driver of the automobile for intentional infliction of emotional distress for the severe distress he suffered by seeing his daughter die. b. the father cannot sue the driver since tort law does not recognize strict liability for automobile accidents. c. the father cannot sue the driver since the driver did not intend to cause harm. d. the father can sue and recover damages from the driver of the automobile for negligent infliction of emotional distress for the severe distress he suffered by seeing his daughter die. e. the father cannot sue the driver since he did not suffer physical injury himself.

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

Which of the following revealed germany’s attempt to ally with mexico against the united states a.)t...

Questions