The united states has a lot of its own oil. if we sunk oil wells and used the oil that is in the united states, we would not have to be dependent on expensive foreign oil. but, if we did that, it would seriously hurt our environment. give your opinions as to why we should or should not put in our own oil wells. pls ! i will give brainliest answer and 15 points!

If you look at it from the global perspective: it does not matter much where the oil is dig from: we all live on one planet and the pollution and environmental problems are not easily contained. So from this point of view, it might actually be better to dig wells in the US, where the United States can have more control of how it's done.

However, it might be better to do this away from human settlements, so in places with smaller population density- this might be an argument to not do it in the US, or do it in the places with smaller population density in the US.

Also, doing it in the US would be better for the environment because it would not have to be transported.

Additionally, if US was not dependent on foreign oil, it could lead to less international conflicts and politics could be more focused on actual need of the population of the US - another argument in favor of digging own wells.

- so I just gave some arguments for using own oil, and one argument against it.

Read more on -

Explanation:

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.

answer; technology;