Sasha, a student in a sociology class, received his graded research paper. he was deducted points for not citing a famous study done five years ago that was nearly identical to the research he conducted. what step in the research process should he have done more carefully?

The fact that Sasha, who is a student in a sociology class,  he was deducted points for his research paper for not citing a famous study done five years ago that was nearly identical to the research he conducted means that she should have done the step: review the evidence/literature more carefully.

By doing literature review Sasha will have shown that she has an in-depth grasp of her subject and that she understands where her  research fits into.

panem is a communist totalitarian dictatorship where all the resources and how they are allocated belongs to the capitol. the districts exist only to provide goods and services for the capital and most of the citizens live in poverty. it is a police state where the "peacekeepers" use force and threats to keep the people under control. dissent is outlawed and those who disobey the law are executed, flogged, or turned into avoxes. the games are another means in which the ruling elite in the capitol exert their power over the districts. when reading the books i drew parallels between panem and the soviet union and north korea. in no way is panem capitalist. the people in the capitol are wealthy but the majority of them are involved in the government somehow. it was the same way in the former soviet union where bigwigs in the communist party and high ranking government officials were given access to goods, services, medical treatments not available to the general public. if you think panem has a capitalist economy you need to brush up on your economics.  

i’m   sure probably just geuss and see which one you can get right, i’m pretty sure it is the combination of goods and services