If you are offended and experience revulsion at my eating veal, and i am horrified and repulsed by your eating tofu, or by touching it, is that adequate evidence or an argument that either eating veal or tofu is immoral?

This may be a debate as well but I would like to clarify that:

Revulsion alone at someone else's action is not sufficient to argue that it is harmful or immoral (answer to the question)

We do not say eating tofu is obviously morally neutral, so I do not have to ask about harm or good, instead it is not sufficient to argue that it is harmful or immoral.

the secretary of state, appointed by the president with the advice and consent of the senate, is the president's chief foreign affairs adviser. the secretary carries out the president's foreign policies through the state department and the foreign service of the united states.