For the sake of rhetorical effect, the writer wants to maintain the pattern of repeating words derived from the same root. Which choice best accomplishes this goal? Attain the unattainable, conquer the unconquerable, clasp the unreachable.

In her article "why should i vote? " stephanie goggin crafts a well-organized and coherent argument. she states that every person of voting age who is registered should vote. she also argues that if you are not registered to vote, you should be. in conclusion, goggin's argument is laid out in a thoughtful and thorough way that is convincing to readers. which element is missing from this evaluation?