How would Wegener have interpreted the fossil evidence, if it showed the plants at Svalbard in Norway lived long ago in a subpolar climate? O He would have concluded that the fossils did not support his theory
O He would have concluded that long ago, plants lived in a subpolar climate.
O He would have concluded that they support his theory of continental drift.
O He would have concluded that there are no plant fossils that support his theory

i will answer your question if you answer mine

the components of a vector are the parts of the vectors that are to each other.

b perpendicular

you'd use the equation that establishes a relationship between  energy  and  wavelength, which looks like this

e=h⋅cλ, where

λ  - the wavelength of the photon; c  - the speed of light, usually given as  3⋅108m/s; h  -  planck's constant, equal to  6.626⋅10−34j s

plug the value you were given for the energy of the photon in the above equation to get the wavelength

e=h⋅cλ⇒λ=h⋅ce

λ=6.626⋅10−34js⋅3⋅108ms−1.257⋅10−24j=1.581⋅10−1m