Why is it advantageous to use a relative frequency histogram instead of a frequency histogram?

To see the difference between frequency and relative frequency we will consider the following example. Suppose we are looking at the history grades of students in 12th grade and have the grades: A, B, C, D, F. The number of each of these grades gives us a frequency for each class:

To determine the relative frequency for each class we first add the total number of data points: 7 + 9 + 18 + 12 + 4 = 50. Next we, divide each frequency by this sum 50.

idk sorry i only needs point for apex

explanation:

this is an example of "committed" time.

committed time, as contracted time, takes need over essential and available time since it is seen as profitable work. it alludes to the time allotted to keep up a home and family. at the point when a man is commuting using committed time this individual may feel that the drive is an obligation to family, for example, strolling youngsters to class or driving a mate to work. contracted and committed time clients may feel that their commute could really compare to the commute of important or leisure time clients on the grounds that their commute is profitable work. in this manner, they might be more disposed to pick a mechanized method of movement.