Air is made up of different gases, such as oxygen, nitrogen, and carbon dioxide.
which statement best describes these three components of air?

they are all classified as pure substances.

they cannot react with another substance.

they are chemically bonded to one another.

they can be classified as elements.

They are all classified as pure substances.

Explanation:

Element is a pure substance which is composed of atoms of similar elements.

Compound is a pure substance which is made from atoms of different elements combined together in a fixed ratio by mass.

Mixtures are heterogeneous materials as they do not have uniform composition and the components are not chemically bonded and not evenly distributed throughout the material.

Air is made up of two elements oxygen and nitrogen and a compound carbon dioxide which are not chemically bonded to one another and thus together form a mixture.

relativism, roughly put, is the view that truth and falsity, right and wrong, standards of reasoning, and procedures of justification are products of differing conventions and frameworks of assessment and that their authority is confined to the context giving rise to them. more precisely, “relativism” covers views which maintain that—at a high level of abstraction—at least some class of things have the properties they have (e.g., beautiful, morally good, epistemically justified) not simpliciter, but only relative to a given framework of assessment (e.g., local cultural norms, individual standards), and correspondingly, that the truth of claims attributing these properties holds only once the relevant framework of assessment is specified or supplied. relativists characteristically insist, furthermore, that if something is only relatively so, then there can be no framework-independent vantage point from which the matter of whether the thing in question is so can be established.

relativism has been, in its various guises, both one of the most popular and most reviled philosophical doctrines of our time. defenders see it as a harbinger of tolerance and the only ethical and epistemic stance worthy of the open-minded and tolerant. detractors dismiss it for its alleged incoherence and uncritical intellectual permissiveness. debates about relativism permeate the whole spectrum of philosophical sub-disciplines. from ethics to epistemology, science to religion, political theory to ontology, theories of meaning and even logic, philosophy has felt the need to respond to this heady and seemingly subversive idea. discussions of relativism often also invoke considerations relevant to the very nature and methodology of philosophy and to the division between the so-called “analytic and continental” camps in philosophy. and yet, despite a long history of debate going back to plato and an increasingly large body of writing, it is still difficult to come to an agreed definition of what, at its core, relativism is, and what philosophical import it has. this entry attempts to provide a broad account of the many ways in which “relativism” has been defined, explained, defended and criticized.

explanation:

u can delete ur account.

1. go on google and write

2 open this and click on your profile pic and if your profile is not appearing, then u have to log in.

3. when u click on your profile pic, there appears four options on the top.

4. click on the 1st option and scroll down and go at the bottom.

5. click on edit profile.

6. there appears a option 'prefernces' and at that option at the right side , 'edit' is written.

7. click on the edit option.

8. there is a option " i want to delete my account" and click on that.

hope this u

and ur welcm

: )