Opposite charges attract! Like charges repel!
This is a kind of electroscope student made in science class to study charges.
Student Procedure:
~Tear off two pieces of tape, each 4 inches (10 cm) long.
~Press each piece firmly on the work table leaving one end of each tape piece sticking up as a handle.
~Quickly pull the tapes from the table and stick one piece on the arm of a straw in one film canister, and the other piece on the arm of a straw in the other film canister.
~Move the canisters so the two pieces of tape are face to face, about 6 inches apart.
~Slowly move the canisters closer together.
~Notice that the two tapes repel each other.
Ms. Mann tore off a another piece of tape and pressed the tape firmly on her lab bench. As she was pulling the piece of tape "up" she ripped a second piece of tape from the dispenser.

What would be a logical argument about how the pieces of tape Ms. Mann prepared would behave? Explain.

as we probably am aware that our atmosphere or air have various levels, each level has different gasses, and each gas has another porousness. at the point when the light originates from lower porousness to higher penetrability, it alters its course. with the goal that implies that when the light originates from the moon to the earth, it alters it's course a lot more occasions. it essentially implies that the state of the light piece of the moon is changed on the earth.

not copied too! hope this !

joke:

h o h o hope you have a merry christmas!

the answer is ampere

the ampere is used to measure electricity. an ampere is a unit of electric current equal. a unit of measure for the flow of current in a circuit. one ampere is the amount of current flow provided when one volt of electrical pressure is applied against one ohm of resistance.

the best answer for these questions would be:

1.            c. is smaller

2.            d) concrete operational

3.            b) interaction with the environment – the children interact with their environment can them learn more.

4.            a) parents who reason openly with children can limit a child’s cognitive ability.