Adriver in massachusetts was sent to traffic court for speeding. the evidence against the driver was that a policewoman observed the driver’s car alongside a second car at a certain moment, and the policewoman had already clocked the second car going faster than the speed limit. the driver argued, "the second car was passing me. i was not speeding." the judge ruled against the driver because, in the judge’s words, "if two cars were side by side, both of you were speeding." if you were a lawyer representing the accused driver, how would you argue this case?