Which is an example of the kinetic-molecular theory not holding true for a gas?
the average kinetic energy of particles depends only on the temperature.
the particles in a gas travel in straight lines in a continuous, random motion.
the attraction between particles causes a gas to condense at low temperatures.
the particles in a gas make up a small portion of the total volume of the gas.

the third option, the attraction between particles causes a gas to condense at low temperatures

Explanation:

1) The kinetic-molecular theory explains the behaviour and properties of the gases in terms of the energy, size, and motion of its particles or molecules.

2) As per the size, the particles are considered to make a small portion of the total volume of the gas, to the point that their size is fully neglected (zero). The particles are considered to not occupy any space (volume) of the gas.

3) The first and the second statments are directly stated by the molecular-kinetic theory: a) the average kinetic energy of particles depends only on the temperature, and b) the particles in a gas travel in straight lines in a continuous, random motion.

Regarding the statement that the attraction between particles causes a gas to condense at low temperatures, this is not true.

First of all, the kinetic molecular theory of the gases is not valid at low temperatures and hight pressures.

Second, depending on the gas and the intermolecular force, at low temperarures a gas might condense or not. It depends on the attractive forces, which are neglected for gases by the molecular-kinetic theory.

cell differentiation  is how generic embryonic  cells  become specialized  cells. this occurs  through a process called gene expression. gene expression is the specific combination of genes that are turned on or off (expressed or repressed), and this is what dictates how a  cell  functions.

explanation:

double the distance = divide strength by 4