Beginning at the nw corner of the intersection of pine & 675, thence north 950 feet, thence west 380 feet, thence south 950 feet, thence southeast 380 feet. is this an acceptable metes and bounds description?

They are correct

Explanation:

The explanation, the description is clear. But normally, to mention directions in the street, if it used the name of the streets, of some specific corners, but normally, the directions are in blocks, for example two blocks to the right, or to the left, etc.

Our answer is A .No, this is not a good legal description because it does not begin and end at the point of beginning.

Explanation:

The question is incorrect here is the correct question

Beginning at the NW corner of the intersection of Pine & 675, thence north 950 feet, thence west 380 feet, thence south 950 feet, thence southeast 380 feet. Is this an acceptable metes and bounds description?

a)No, this is not a good legal description because it does not begin and end at the point of beginning.

b)No, legal descriptions cannot be determined in this manner.

c)No because there is no reference to the meridians or parallels.

d)Yes, this is a good legal description because it does begin and end at the point of beginning.

Solution

No, this is not an acceptable metes and bounds description , this is not a good legal description because it does not begin and end at the point of beginning. Hence,option(A) is correct.

where's the following? you gotta add it to know what the choices are

explanation: