Which option identifies ways that people positively affect earth’s resources? use cars that emit fewer harmful gases, build dams, and stop using all resources stop using all resources, increase mining efforts, and halt the runoff of factory waste into rivers and streams build dams, use cars that emit fewer harmful gases, and halt the runoff of factory waste into rivers and streams increase mining efforts, build dams, and use cars that emit fewer harmful gases

Build dams, use cars that emit fewer harmful gases, and halt the runoff of factory waste into rivers and streams.

Explanation:

Building dams would help in generating hydroelectricity and reduce floods. Using cars that emit fewer harmful gases would help in controlling pollution and global warming. Factory waste drained into streams and rivers pollutes the water and is dangerous for aquatic plants and animals. Hence, halting the runoff of factory waste into rivers and streams would save water pollution.

Halting the use of resources is impractical. Increasing the mining efforts would lead to further depletion of resources. Hence, the correct options are: build dams, use cars that emit fewer harmful gases, and halt the runoff of factory waste into rivers and streams which would positively affect Earth's resources.

C. Build dams, use cars that emit fewer harmful gases, and halt the runoff of factory waste into rivers and streams.

Explanation:

with 5 seconds, no, but over time if the police car stays at 65m/s ad the speeding car stays at 60, then obviously yes, but the answer to your question would be, no.

hope this : )

graph slopes whilst gas cools, then it is flat whilst conensation to liquid happens, the coolong liquid then graphs as a slope when it solidifies graph is flat

latent heat