Which of these best describes the purpose for “hands-only” CPR? Hands-only CPR is better and more effective than full CPR and is now the best way to provide CPR for any patient by any responder
Hands-only CPR reduces risk of liability and increases oxygenation better than CPR with mouth-to-mouth resuscitation
Hands-only CPR is now the only method for providing CPR regardless your level of education and expertise
Hands-only CPR was designed for those who are not trained or feel uncomfortable delivering mouth-to-mouth breaths. It doesn't replace traditional CPR

D

Explanation:

The point of hands only CPR is to make it easier on those with a lack of training a give them a way to give care to someone who needs it even if they do not know how to, the point is that if you are not in sports med or EMT training then you will at least be able to help if no one else is around, otherwise use an AED

answer:

the mother

explanation:

answer:

thousands of years before the arrival of the british, australia was settled by the indigenous people of australia called the aborigines. this timeline begins when the europeans first arrived. 1606 - the first european to land at australia is dutch explorer captain willem janszoon.

?