Multiple chice! 1.) equations can be translated because they are sets of points they are on located on graphs they have distinct values they include operators 2.) a translated equation should be equivalent to the original equation except for variables referring to a given point variables referring to x or y operators should be reversed none of the above

Juliana says that she can use the patterns of equivalent ratios in the multiplication table below to write an infinite number of ratios that are equivalent to 6: 10. which statement explains whether juliana is correct? she is correct because she can multiply 6 and 10 by any number to form an equivalent ratio. she is correct because 6: 10 can be written as 1: 2 and there are an infinite number of ratios for 1: 2. she is not correct because the multiplication table does not include multiples of 10. she is not correct because 6: 10 is equivalent to 3: 5 and there are only 9 ratios in the multiplication table that are equivalent to 3: 5.

Me asap on # : explain how factoring a trinomial, ax^2+ bx+ c, when a does not equal 1 different from factoring a trinomial when a = 1.

Mis the midpoint of rq if rm equals 2x + 5 and mq equals 4x - 9 what is the length of rq