subject
Mathematics, 01.08.2019 03:30 ChikiChu

Is the given conjecture a valid rule for the following sequence? if not, give a counterexample. sequence: 1, 2, 3, 6, 18, 108, conjecture: multiply the previous 2 terms to get the next term. a. yes, the rule holds. b. no; 3 is a counterexample. c. no; 6 is a counterexample. d. no; 108 is a counterexample.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:00
How much dextrose 70% must be mixed with dextrose 5% to prepare 1,000 ml of dextrose 20%?
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:30
Consider a cube that has sides of length l. now consider putting the largest sphere you can inside this cube without any point on the sphere lying outside of the cube. the volume ratio -volume of the sphere/ volume of the cube is 1. 5.2 × 10−1 2. 3.8 × 10−1 3. 1.9 4. 2.5 × 10−1 5. 3.8
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 23:00
What ia the sum if the first 7 terms of the geometric series
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 00:30
A10 inch cookie cake is divided into 8 slices. what is the area of 3 slices
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Is the given conjecture a valid rule for the following sequence? if not, give a counterexample. seq...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722363