Which statement best explains if the graph correctly represents the proportional relationship y = 3.5x? a graph of a coordinate plane is shown. points are graphed at 1 and 3.5 and 2 and 7. the points are joined by a line. it does, the points shown on the line would be part of y = 3.5x. it does not, proportions cannot be represented on a graph. it does not, the points shown on the line would not be part of y = 3.5x. it does, all proportions can be shown on the graph of this line.

It does, the points shown on the line would be part of

Step-by-step explanation:

see the attached figure to better understand the problem  

we know that

A relationship between two variables, x, and y, represent a proportional variation if it can be expressed in the form or

In a proportional relationship the constant of proportionality k is equal to the slope m of the line and the line passes through the origin

In this problem we have

The slope is equal to ------> is a positive slope

The line passes through the origin

therefore

This linear equation represent a proportional variation

Verify the values of the points of the graph with the equation

For

-----> is correct

For

-----> is correct

6. 104

7. 52/37

8. 2704

9. 140608

10. -52

11. |52|=52

12. 1/52

13. 156

14. 26

15. 40

16. 37

17. -364

18. 53 1/3

19. 50.96

20. 43 2/3

21. 78

22. 50.75

23. 47.63

24. 163.28

25. 10400

26. 338

27. 208

28. 2704 square inches

29. 312 square meters

30. don't know what its asking, tell me so i can tell you

31. 8490.56

32. 52 degrees would be an acute angle

33. 128 degrees

34. 20.8

35. 39

36. 208

i believe the answers 600m