Which is the best interpretation of the solution set for the compound inequality? 3/2x-1< 2x + 4 or 3(2/3x + 1) < 11 a. no solution b. x > -10 c. x< 4 d. all real numbers.

solution:

→c= a b , that is product of a and b is possible only when when a is m × n matrix and b is n × p matrix.

that is, number of columns of a= number of rows of b.

so, size of matrix , c= a b is , if a = (m × n)matrix

b= (n × p)matrix

then a b = [ (m × n)matrix] ×[   (n × p)matrix ]

→→c= a b= [m × p ] matrix

→→size of product a b will be equal to = number of rows of a × number of columns of b

i pretty sure it is