subject
Mathematics, 22.02.2022 01:10 dereklilgoat

Saskia is solving an equation in one variable and gets the equivalent equation 3=3. Assuming her work is correct, what can she conclude about the original equation?


Saskia is solving an equation in one variable and gets the equivalent equation 3=3. Assuming her wo

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:00
Bring the fraction a/a-4 to a denominator of 16-a^2
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 21:30
Write an equation of the line that passes through the point (2, 3) and is perpendicular to the line x = -1. a) y = 1 b) y = 3 c) y = 0 eliminate d) y = -3
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 22:00
Worth 100 points need the answers asap first row -x^2 2x^2 (x/2)^2 x^2 x is less than 2 x is greater than 2 x is less than or equal to 2 x is greater than or equal to 2 second row -5 -5/2 4 5 •2 is less than x& x is less than 4 •2 is less than or equal to x & x is less than or equal to 4 •2 is less than or equal to x& x is less than 4 •2 is less than x& x is less than or equal to 4
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 01:00
#7. m is the midpoint of pq, the diameter of the circle o is 13in. and rm = 4in. find pm find pq
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Saskia is solving an equation in one variable and gets the equivalent equation 3=3. Assuming her wor...
Questions
question
Chemistry, 28.06.2019 00:30
question
Mathematics, 28.06.2019 00:30
Questions on the website: 13722363