Mathematics, 06.11.2021 03:00 wirchakethan23
Which best explains whether a triangle with side lengths 2 in., 5 in., and 4 in. is an acute triangle?
The triangle is acute because 22 + 52 > 42.
The triangle is acute because 2 + 4 > 5.
The triangle is not acute because 22 + 42 < 52.
The triangle is not acute because 22 < 42 + 52.
Answers: 1
Another question on Mathematics
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 15:50
Which of the following represents a number squared is equal to twenty more than nine times that number ? a) x squared = 9x + 20 b) x squared = 20x + 9 c) x squared > 9 + 20x d) x squared = 9 + x + 20
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:50
The graph shows the distance kerri drives on a trip. what is kerri's speed . a. 25 b.75 c.60 d.50
Answers: 1
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:00
1: 4 if the wew 35 surfboards at the beach how many were short boards?
Answers: 1
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 21:00
Which expressions are equivalent to -7+3(-4e-3)? choose all answers that apply: choose all answers that apply: a -4(3e+4)? 4(3e+4) b 12e12e c none of the above
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Which best explains whether a triangle with side lengths 2 in., 5 in., and 4 in. is an acute triangl...
Questions
