Nchara used the distributive property and the properties of equality to solve the equation - 34 - 2x) - 4(x-4) + 2x + 11, got the result -5 -5 at her last step, and became confused. Did Anchara hake a mistake in applying the properties? If so, describe the mistake and its significance, and tell how to correct it. If not, explain the algebraic and graphical meaning of Anchara's result

x ≥ 18 is your answer

step-by-step explanation:

let "a number" = x

(2/3)x + 17 ≥ 29

isolate the variable (x). do the opposite of pemdas (parenthesis, exponent (& root), multiplication, division, addition, subtraction).

first, subtract 17 from both sides.

(2/3)x + 17 (-17) ≥ 29 (-17)

(2/3)x ≥ 29 - 17

(2/3)x ≥ 12

next, multiply 3/2 to both sides to isolate the x

(3/2)(2/3)x ≥ 12(3/2)

x ≥ 12(3/2)

simplify. multiply, then divide

x ≥ (12 * 3)/2

x ≥ (36)/2

x ≥ 18

x ≥ 18 is your answer

~

step-by-step explanation:

jbjuiuhuhuuy

mathpapa

step-by-step explanation: