It’s clear that this course teaches a combination of analytical and Euclidean geometry. Based on your experiences so far, which approach to geometry do you prefer? Why? Which approach is easier to extend beyond two dimensions? What are some situations in which one approach to geometry would prove more beneficial than the other? Describe the situation and why you think analytical or Euclidean geometry is more applicable. Think of a topic of interest to you within the subject of Earth and Space Science. How might the daily activities of a scientist studying that topic or field differ from a chemist, physicist, or biologist? How might it be the same? In what ways would the scientist likely use the scientific method? Which types of data would they likely analyze most often?
4-5 Complete Sentences for Brainiest