Suppose the null hypothesis is not rejected. State the conclusion based on the results of the test. Three years ago, the mean price of a single-family home was $243,775. A real estate broker believes that the mean price has increased since then.
Which of the following is the correct conclusion?
A. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean price of a single-family home has increased.
B. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean price of a single-family home has increased.
C. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean price of a single-family home has not changed.
D. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean price of a single-family home has not changed.

  or  

step-by-step explanation:

if the four friends split the cost, p, of the pizza evenly, then each friend pays one-fourth of the cost of the pizza.

the expression is   or  

step-by-step explanation:

a child is 12 years old, and his father is 32 years older. in how many years will the age of the father be 2 times the age of the child?

******************

this needs to be the answer format, or else your answer is incomplete.

if the number of years is x, then the equation is

in __ years

in 2010, the population of the state of california is 37.29 × 10⁶

step-by-step explanation:

population of los angeles = 3.79 × 10⁶

population of california = 9.84 × population of los angeles

                                        = 9.84 × 3.79 × 10⁶

                                        = 37.2936 × 10⁶

                                        = 37.29 × 10⁶

∴ in 2010, the population of the state of california is 37.29 × 10⁶

52-x2 fgdhbjagraubgfdshhghdg