Answer and explantion please?​

Juliana says that she can use the patterns of equivalent ratios in the multiplication table below to write an infinite number of ratios that are equivalent to 6: 10. which statement explains whether juliana is correct? she is correct because she can multiply 6 and 10 by any number to form an equivalent ratio. she is correct because 6: 10 can be written as 1: 2 and there are an infinite number of ratios for 1: 2. she is not correct because the multiplication table does not include multiples of 10. she is not correct because 6: 10 is equivalent to 3: 5 and there are only 9 ratios in the multiplication table that are equivalent to 3: 5.

Which rule describes the composition of transformations that maps ajkl to aj"k"l"? ro. 900 o to, -2(x, y) to, -20 ro, 900(x, y) ro, 9000 t-2. o(x,y) t-2, 00 ro, 900(x, y)

What is the value of p in the equation y^ = -4x?