Give an equiavelence relation on the set of integers that consists of 4 equivalence classes, two of which are infinite and two of which are finite. Your answer must be provided as a partition of size 4 of the set of integers. (Hint: Make sure you provide a partition of the requested set, namely all integers. A partition consists of disjoint non-empty subsets whose union is the whole set.)

Juliana says that she can use the patterns of equivalent ratios in the multiplication table below to write an infinite number of ratios that are equivalent to 6: 10. which statement explains whether juliana is correct? she is correct because she can multiply 6 and 10 by any number to form an equivalent ratio. she is correct because 6: 10 can be written as 1: 2 and there are an infinite number of ratios for 1: 2. she is not correct because the multiplication table does not include multiples of 10. she is not correct because 6: 10 is equivalent to 3: 5 and there are only 9 ratios in the multiplication table that are equivalent to 3: 5.

Jenny earned a 77 on her most recent test jenny score is no less then 5 points greater then 4/5 of terrance’s score if t represents terrance score which inequality represents the situation

If f(x) = 6x – 4, what is f(x) when x = 8? a2 b16 c44 d52