A new test is proposed that may be better or worse than the standard test. To assess their relative efficacy, a pilot study is conducted where both tests are used on the same subjects and compared with the true diagnosis. Let + = correct assessment, − = incorrect assessment. Standard Test New Test N
+ + 82
+ - 5
- + 10
- - 3
100

Thus, for 82 infants, both tests make the correct classifica- tion, for 3 infants both tests make the wrong classification, for 5 infants the standard test makes the correct diagnosis while the new test does not, and for 10 infants the new test makes the correct diagnosis while the standard test does not.

Required:
Perform a hypothesis test to compare the accuracy of the two tests, and report a two-sided p-value.

at first, in 1635, the evening meetings had been just for women . .

what relationship between ideas is shown in the text above?

question 1 options:

location of events

similarity of events

timing of events

examples of an idea

step-by-step explanation:

1/3 + 1/5 = 8/15.

step-by-step explanation:

hope it

c. y = 1/4 x + 5

step-by-step explanation:

first, put the equation of the line on the graph into slope-intercept form

(y = mx + b):   y = -4x + 8

second, a perpendicular line has to have "an opposite/reciprocal slope" to the original slope. so, find the "m" value in your original equation (it's -4, right? )

original slope: m = -4   perpendicular slope: change the sign to its opposite and find the reciprocal ("flip" the number)

new slope is now positive (b/c the original slope was negative 4), and it's 1/4 (not the original slope of 4 or 4/1)

step-by-step explanation:

given that ab is divided into equal parts as

ac, cd, de, ef, fg, gh, hi, ib.

from this we find that f is the midpoint of ab.

so using mid point formula we find

f = (3,7)

similarly considering fb, we get

h = mid point of fb = ((6,6) and g, mid point of fh is

g = (9/2, 13/2)

i is mid point of hb

so i =(15/2,11/2)