5.11. A manufacturing process produces 500 parts per hour. A sample part is selected about every half hour, and after five parts are obtained, the average of these five measurements is plotted on an x control chart.
(a) Is this an appropriate sampling scheme if the assignable cause in the process results in an instantaneous upward shift in the mean that is of very short duration?
(b) If your answer is no, propose an alternative procedure. If your answer is yes, justify.
5.12.
Consider the sampling scheme proposed in Exercise 5.11. Is this scheme appropriate if the assignable cause results in a slow, prolonged upward drift in the mean? If your answer is no, propose an alternative procedure.

Following are the response to the given points:

Step-by-step explanation:

For question 5.11:

For point a:

For all the particular circumstances, it was not an appropriate sampling strategy as each normal distribution acquired is at a minimum of 30(5) = 150 or 2.5 hours for a time. Its point is not absolutely fair if it exhibits any spike change for roughly 10 minutes.

For point b:

The problem would be that the process can transition to an in the state in less than half an hour and return to in the state. Thus, each subgroup is a biased selection of the whole element created over the last hours. Another sampling approach is a group.

For question 5.12:

This production method creates 500 pieces each day. A sampling section is selected every half an hour, and the average of five dimensions can be seen in a line graph when 5 parts were achieved.

This is not an appropriate sampling method if the assigned reason leads to a sluggish, prolonged uplift. The difficulty would be that gradual or longer upward drift in the procedure takes or less half an hour then returns to a controlled state. Suppose that a shift of both the detectable size will last hours . An alternative type of analysis should be a random sample of five consecutive pieces created every hour.

d≈7.07in

step-by-step explanation:

54

step-by-step explanation: