I read an article saying that in the full population, there's a significant, positive correlation between the strength of your hand (grip strength) and the strength of your upper arm (arm strength). I want to see if that's true, and I have devices that can measure this accurately. I gathered a sample of average, healthy 21-year-olds and measured these two variables. My results were non-significant. Why didn't I find a significant correlation

Restricted Range

Step-by-step explanation:

Required

Reason for insignificant correlation

From the question, we understand that the article discussed the full population while you restricted the correlation to only 21-year-olds age groups.

You left out other age groups included in the original dataset that was analyzed and reported by the article. The term that describes this act is restricted range, because other age groups are not represented in your analysis.

c.

step-by-step explanation:

she should of added 9^2 and 12^2. that is because it is a^2+b^2=c^2. c^2 is the hypotenuse and should always be bigger than the other two numbers. which is why she should of added 9 squared and 12 squared together instead of 15 squared.

the answer on e2020 was d.