Can someone please help me​

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Enter the number of complex zeros for the polynomial function in the box. f(x) = x+ + 5x² +6

Astore has apples on sale for three dollars or 2 pounds how many pounds of apples can you buy for nine dollars if an apple is approximately 5 ounces how many apples can you buy for nine dollars