In the function f(x) =5(x2-4x +_)+15

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Triangle dog was rotated to create triangle d'o'g'. describe the transformation using details and degrees. (10 points)

If you flip a coin 3 times, what is the probability of flipping heads 3 times? a. p(3 heads) = 3/8 b. p(3 heads) = 1/6 c. p(3 heads) = 1/8 d. p(3 heads) = 1/2