The value of the expression 16 -3/4 is

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Elizabeth is using a sample to study american alligators. she plots the lengths of their tails against their total lengths to find the relationship between the two attributes. which point is an outlier in this data set?

Interest begins accruing the date of the transaction except for auto loans mortgages credit card cash advances credit card purchases