Asquare has the coordinates (4, −3), (6, −3), (6, −5), and (4, −5) at its vertices. the transformed square has the coordinates (16, −12), (24, −12), (24, −20), and (16, −20) at its vertices. are the square and its transformation congruent? why or why not? a. no, the transformation is a dilation of the square with a scale factor of 4. b. no, the transformation is a dilation of the square with a scale factor of . c. yes, the transformation is a dilation of the square with a scale factor of 4. d. yes, the transformation is a dilation of the square with a scale factor of .

last one.

step-by-step explanation:

last one.

generally speaking, the others follow some sort of pattern that correlates to either linear (looks like a straight line) or sinusoidal (looks like an s).

the last one is just a random cloud of points that doesn't correlate to any particular known order.

answer: a

step-by-step explanation: the answer is a due to the rule of symmetry; that a line of symmetry must divide a figure into 2 pieces that are the exact same, only reflected over a line of symmetry. b and c do not have lines of symmetry and would not divide the figure evenly, thus making the answer a.