Which statement best explains if the graph correctly represents the proportional relationship y = 3.5x? it does not, the points shown on the line would not be part of y = 3.5x. it does not, proportions cannot be represented on a graph. it does, the points shown on the line would be part of y = 3.5x. it does, all proportions can be shown on the graph of this line.

It does, the points shown on the line would be part of

Step-by-step explanation:

see the attached figure to better understand the problem  

we know that

A relationship between two variables, x, and y, represent a proportional variation if it can be expressed in the form or

In a proportional relationship the constant of proportionality k is equal to the slope m of the line and the line passes through the origin

In this problem we have

The slope is equal to ------> is a positive slope

The line passes through the origin

therefore

This linear equation represent a proportional variation

Verify the values of the points of the graph with the equation

For

-----> is correct

For

-----> is correct

true

step-by-step explanation:

the correct answer is a) they believe they have a "just cause."

islamic terrorists justify their violent actions because they believe they have a "just cause."

every act of terrorism of islamic sects is done “in the name of allah”. that justifies their actions. islam people who commit those terrorist attacks are not afraid to die. that is why the attacks have horrible consequences. they know they are going to die and they are proud to do it because it is in the name of allah, so it is justified and is for a “good cause.”

since the very beginning of the conflict with israel, islam is fighting a “sacred war”, respecting the words stated in the qur’an. they fight against the domination of the western countries and to defend their occupied territories.