Choose the abbreviation of the postulate or theorem that supports the conclusion that was not.

given:
w = n, s = t, ws = nt.

a) sss
b) sas
c) asa
d) aas

ASA postulate supports the conclusion that WAS ≅ NOT.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given in the triangles WAS and NOT,

W = N, S = T, WS = NT

So,

According to ASA (Angle - Side(included) - Angle) the two triangles WAS and NOT are congruent.

*As WS and NT are included by the angles so they are congruent by ASA, not by AAS (Angle - Angle - Side(not included))

i really dont know

step-by-step explanation:

yess

step-by-step explanation:

idk whyy this is happening, i cant even read my notification bc i keep getting errors

~coco