Jamie rolls a 6-sided die 30 times and determines that the experimental probability of rolling a 2 is 1/15. the theoretical probability of rolling a 2 is 1/6 what could jamie do to make his experimental results more closely match the theoretical probability?
a. he can increase the number of trials.
b. he can decrease the number of trials.
c. he can increase the number of sides on the die.
d. he can decrease the number of sides on the die.

Theoretical Probability is what you expect to happen whereas Experimental Probability is what actually happens.

Probability is calculated same way for both, dividing the number of possible ways an outcome can occur divided by the total number of outcomes.

Experimental probability gets closer and closer to the theoretical probability as more and more trials are conducted.

So, Jamie should increase the number of trials to make his experimental probability results closer to the theoretical probability result. Answer choice A is correct.

ANSWER: A

step-by-step explanation:

the options are kind of confusing. i can tell you what i see going on here when i look at the graph.

the class and exam medians are closely related, and it looks like the low outlier on the exam did pull the median lower. [tex][/tex]

for this case we have by definition, if two lines are perpendicular, then the product of their slopes is -1.

then, given the following line:

so,

we are looking for m_ {2}:

then, the line is given by:

we find "b" replacing the given point:

finally, the equation is:

option c