subject
Mathematics, 11.11.2019 04:31 alexussaniyah

Which best explains whether a triangle with side lengths 2 in., 5 in., and 4 in. is an acute triangle? the triangle is acute because 22 + 52 > 42. the triangle is acute because 2 + 4 > 5. the triangle is not acute because 22 + 42 < 52. the triangle is not acute because 22 < 42 + 52.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 13:00
20 points! asap! a is known to be 6,500 feet above sea level; ab = 600 feet. the angle at a looking up at p is 20°. the angle at b looking up at p is 35°. how far above sea level is the peak p? find the height of the mountain peak to the nearest foot. height above sea level =
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 16:40
One of the inventors of integrated circuits observed that the number of transistors that fit on an integrated circuit will double every 24 months. what type of relationship most appropriately models this situation?
Answers: 3
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:00
[10 points, algebra 2]according to my answer key the restrictions are -1 and 4. but why not positive 1?
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:00
Which statement best explains why ben uses the width hi to create the arc at j from point k
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Which best explains whether a triangle with side lengths 2 in., 5 in., and 4 in. is an acute triangl...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 20.09.2020 01:01
question
Mathematics, 20.09.2020 01:01
question
Health, 20.09.2020 01:01
question
Mathematics, 20.09.2020 01:01
question
Physics, 20.09.2020 01:01
question
Social Studies, 20.09.2020 01:01
Questions on the website: 13722365