Irrelevant Disjunction(6 points) Use the rules of the probability calculus to prove the following facts. Let e, e∗, and h be arbitrary sentences each having probability other than 0 or 1. Assume that e is a deductive logical consequence of h (i. e., the argument with premise hand conclusion e is deductively valid), and that Cr(e) does not equal Cr(e∧e∗) (i. e.,e and e∗ are not perfectly correlated)

(i) Cr(e∨e∗)>Cr(e)

ii) μd(e∨e∗,h)< μd (e, h)

the inequality is:

250c+180g≥950

step-by-step explanation:

let c denotes the number of days in a week   miyoko worked as a cryptographer.

and g denotes the number of days in a week she works as a geologist.

now we are given that she earns $250 for every day she works as a cryptographer,and earns $180 for every day she works as a geologist.

now miyoko's goal is to earn more than $950 this week.

hence, the inequality could be represented as:

250c+180g≥950

i think the answer is fried chicken ; >

step-by-step explanation:

boxplot e is the answer

1. sometimes

2.   never

3   .08c = 7.50+.05c   250 pages

step-by-step explanation:

1.   sometimes

the theoretical probability of rolling a 1 is 1/6.   perhaps you got really lucky and never rolled a 1   in those 60 times.   your experimental probability is 0.   or perhaps you rolled a 1   20 times.   your experimental probability is 20/60 is 1/3.     it really just depends on how you rolled in that experiment.

2.   never

the probability of the event occurring is 1.   that is being 100 % sure it will happen.   that is the maximum amount of confidence we have.

3.   no customer card cost:   .08 times number of pages

customer card cost:   7.50 + .05 times number of pages

we want to find when it costs the same amount, so we will set these equal

let c = number of pages

.08c = 7.50+.05c

subtract .05c from each side

.08c-.05c = 7.5+.05c-.05c

.03c=7.5

divide each side by .03

.03c/.03 = 7.5/03

c =250  

the cost is the same at 250 pages