What is the alternative hypothesis, Ha, for this
situation?

Which statement accurately explains whether a reflection over the y-axis and a 270° counterclockwise rotation would map figure acb onto itself? a coordinate plane with figure acb with point a at 1, 1, c at 3, 4 and b at 5, 1 yes, a″c″b″ is located at a″(1, 1), c″(4, 3), and b″(1, 5) yes, a″c″b′ is located at a″(1, 1), c″(3, 4), and b″(5, 1) no, a″c″b″ is located at a″(1, 1), c″(4, 3), and b″(1, 5) no, a″c″b″ is located at a″(1, 1), c″(3, 4), and b″(5, 1)

Mary beth used the mapping rule to find the coordinates of a point that had been rotated 90° counterclockwise around the origin. examine the steps to determine whether she made an error. m (3, –6) is rotated 90° counterclockwise. (x, y) → (–y, x) 1. switch the x- and y-coordinates: (6, –3) 2. multiply the new x-coordinate by –1: (6(–1), –3) 3. simplify: (–6, –3) .

Which sum or difference identity would you use to verify that cos (180° - q) = -cos q? a.) sin (a -b) = sin a cos b – cos a sin b b.) cos (a -b) = cos a cos b – sin a sin b c.) cos (a -b) = cos a cosb + sin a sin b d.) sin (a + b) = sin a cos b + cos a sin b